If you’ve searched for “executive coaching vs. leadership coaching” and found answers that contradict each other, you’re not imagining it. The terms overlap. Practitioners use them interchangeably. And the market does little to clarify which one you actually need.
The shortest honest answer: Executive coaching is a company-sponsored development programme for senior leaders, focused on improving performance in their specific role.
Leadership coaching focuses on building leadership capability at any level — from first-time managers to C-suite executives.
The two are often confused, and most organisations default to calling both ‘executive coaching’ because it sounds weightier. In practice, most senior leaders need both.
For the Thai workplace, the distinction matters. Our leadership culture is shifting; the old command and control style is losing its grip as younger professionals reject it. Multinational parent companies demand coaching cultures, and retention depends on leaders who can develop people rather than direct them.
Research from the Corporate Leadership Council found that leaders who adopt a coaching approach see a 19% increase in team performance and a 39% improvement in employee engagement.
What follows is the framework we use with clients at Victus People. It covers:
- the core mindset you need before you coach,
- 5 practical strategies mapped to the COACH model and
- guidance on choosing a structured leadership coaching program or executive coaching program.
Each tool referenced below is available as a free download on our Resources page if you want to take it into your next 1:1.
Master Core Leadership Coaching Skills
Before strategies, we need the foundation, and the foundation is not about your team members. It’s about you.
Sometimes the barrier to leadership and executive coaching isn’t your team member. It’s your own reaction.
The AARR pause is a 60-second self-coaching tool to run before a difficult conversation. Read more about it in “How to coach your leaders?” It’s the first leadership coaching skill because without it, everything breaks down.
• A — Awareness. What am I feeling right now?
• A — Acceptance. Yes, this is my reaction.
• R — Reframe. What else could be true here?
• R — Response. How do I want to show up?
In Thai workplaces, where face matters on both sides of the table, this pause is the difference between a conversation that escalates and one that builds trust. A leader who walks into a 1:1 still carrying frustration from the previous meeting will coach poorly, no matter how good their questions are.

5 Essential Coaching Strategies for Leaders in Thailand
These 5 leadership coaching strategies map directly to the COACH framework.
Strategy 1: C — Clarity (Ask what they want, not what you think they need)
The default leadership move in Thai organisations is to diagnose and prescribe. Real coaching starts with the team member’s own goal.
“What outcome are you hoping for?”
“What would success look like in 30 days? ”
This feels slow. But it’s the only way to avoid solving a problem they never asked you to solve.
Strategy 2: O — Open Presence (Put the phone down)
Open presence is undivided attention and genuine curiosity. Do not think about your reply while they’re still speaking. In cultures where being visibly busy is read as being important, choosing twenty minutes of full presence with one team member is actually a genuine signal of respect. And people remember it.
Strategy 3: A — Active Listening (Count to seven before you speak)
Real active listening includes silence. After a coaching question, count to seven internally before jumping in. In Thai 1:1s, where kreng jai often makes people hesitate before being direct, this silence is an invitation for the other person to speak up.
It tells the other person: there’s room for what you actually want to say. Most leaders interrupt in 3 seconds. The difference between 3 and 7 is where the real answer lives.
Strategy 4: C — Curious Questions (One at a time)
Open-ended, one question at a time. And crucially, no disguising advice as a question.
“Have you thought about doing X?” is not a coaching question; it’s a suggestion with a question mark, and that stops people from thinking by themselves.
Replace it with “What options haven’t you considered yet?”
The first closes thinking, the second opens it.
Strategy 5: H — Help Grow (Commitment, then celebration)
Close every coaching conversation with a commitment question:
“what action will you take, by when, and what support do you need?”
Then acknowledge progress. In Thai organisations, acknowledgment is often subtle or absent, and this is one of the easiest places to differentiate yourself as a leader.
A simple “well done” or acknowledging a small win out loud costs nothing. And this is not Western sentimentality. It’s how habits form.
After coaching hundreds of leaders, here’s what I know: this only works when the problem is theirs to solve, the trust is already there, and you want them to own the outcome not just comply with yours.
The moment it becomes a crisis, a disciplinary issue, or a skill they simply don’t have yet, put the coaching down. Pick up a different tool. The best coaches know when not to coach.

Professional Leadership Coaching Programs
Here’s the ceiling: self-taught coaching only takes you so far. Reading books on coaching questions or watching LinkedIn videos on active listening creates the illusion of skill without real substance.
The best leadership coaching and executive coaching are built on ICF competencies, validated assessment tools like Insights Discovery, and frameworks for psychological safety and feedback. That’s the structure that separates leaders who coach well once from leaders who coach well consistently.
Structured leadership coaching programs and leadership coaching training offer 3 things self-teaching cannot:
- Feedback on your actual coaching — from someone qualified to give it
- A peer cohort to practise with
- Accountability over a long enough arc that habits actually change
For Thai organisations, there’s a fourth. Most leadership coaching frameworks were designed in the West. A good programme does the cultural translation work for you. A bad one leaves that to chance and you feel it in the room.
So which do you actually need?
Stop overthinking the labels. The question is simpler than it looks.
Developing a specific senior leader in a specific role? That’s executive coaching.
Building leadership capability across the organisation? A leadership coaching programme — delivered one-to-one, in cohorts, or through team sessions — will serve you better and scale further.
Want both? Executive coaching and leadership coaching can be designed to run in parallel. Most mature organisations eventually do exactly that.
Moving Forward
The shift happening in Thai workplaces is real and accelerating. Command and control is being replaced by a Thai-inflected coaching culture that honours hierarchy while opening space for voice, development, and honest feedback.
The leaders who adapt first will hold onto the people everyone else is trying to retain.
At Victus People, our leadership coaching programs are designed for Thai organisations navigating exactly this shift, combining ICF-credentialed coaching, Insights Discovery delivered in Thai and English, and cross-cultural fluency.
Want to start today? Download The COACH Framework: A 3-Step Self-Assessment Guide and How to Use Coaching Skills in Everyday Leadership.
Conversations from our free Resources page, the same tools we use with clients, are yours to take into your next 1:1. Explore leadership coaching programs at Victus People.

